"I think the legislature intended this law to protect landlords' investments. If a pet harms that investment, then it's a 'pet' under the law. If it does not, as I believe Howard does not, then we should overturn the lower court's decision and not permit the eviction." says Judge Jackson.

• I agree with you. We should overturn the lower court's decision.
• I understand what you're saying, but I agree with Judge Lee, that we should interpret the law as it's written.